Jojanneke E. van Amesfoort, Norah M. Van Mello & Renate van Genugten
11 MARCH 2024 – International Breastfeeding Journal volume 19, Article number: 18 (2024)
Abstract
Background
We present a case of non-puerperal induced lactation in transgender woman. Medical literature on lactation induction for transgender women is scarce, and the majority of literature and protocols on lactation induction is based on research in cisgender women. Healthcare professionals may lack the precise knowledge about lactation induction and may therefore feel insecure when advice is requested. Subsequently, there is a rising demand for guidelines and support.
Methods
Patient medical record was consulted and a semi-structured interview was conducted to explore the motive for lactation induction, the experience of lactation induction, and to gather additional information about the timeline and course of events.
Case presentation
In this case a 37-year-old transgender woman, who was under the care of the centre of expertise on gender dysphoria in Amsterdam, and in 2020 started lactation induction because she had the wish to breastfeed her future infant. She was in a relationship with a cisgender woman and had been using gender affirming hormone therapy for 13 years. Prior to initiating gender affirming hormone therapy she had cryopreserved her semen. Her partner conceived through Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection, using our patient’s cryopreserved sperm.
To induce lactation, we implemented a hormone-regimen to mimic pregnancy, using estradiol and progesterone, and a galactogogue; domperidone. Our patient started pumping during treatment. Dosage of progesterone and estradiol were significantly decreased approximately one month before childbirth to mimic delivery and pumping was increased. Our patient started lactating and although the production of milk was low, it was sufficient for supplementary feeding and a positive experience for our patient.
Two weeks after birth, lactation induction was discontinued due to suckling problems of the infant and low milk production.
Conclusions
This case report underlined that lactation induction protocols commonly used for cisgender women are also effective in transgender women. However, the amount of milk produced may not be sufficient for exclusive nursing. Nevertheless, success of induced lactation may be attributed to its importance for parent-infant bonding, rather than the possibility of exclusive chestfeeding.
Background
Chestfeeding (i.e. gender neutral term for breastfeeding) was, for a long time, solely associated with maternity in cisgender women (i.e. individuals who were assigned female gender at birth and identify as a woman). However, this has increasingly been put into question due to increasing availability and visibility of non-puerperal lactation induction in mothers of adopted children, partners in same-sex relationships and biological mothers of a surrogate pregnancy [1], and puerperal lactation in transgender and gender diverse individuals [2]. Transgender women (i.e. individuals assigned male gender at birth (AMAB) and who affirm their gender as female) and non-binary individuals who are AMAB may wish to chestfeed their infants and constitute a growing population. They may do so through non-puerperal lactation induction [3,4,5].
Literature and protocols on lactation induction is scarce and merely based on case reports in cisgender women [6,7,8,9,10]. Research focussed on induction of lactation in transgender women is lacking and to our knowledge, only three case reports on lactation induction in transgender women have previously been published [4, 5, 11]. However, transgender women chestfeeding is not limited to these case reports. On mainstream media, cases and experiences of these women are broadcast and may inspire other transgender women to desire this themselves [12,13,14]. Therefore, the true incidence of lactation induction in transgender women is unknown.
Protocols for induced lactation in transgender women are not readily available. In 2020 Trautner et al. published a cross sectional survey that showed the interest in lactation induction for both providers and patients [15]. The survey was held for attendees of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) in 2018 and a total of 82 attendees responded to the survey (10.5% response rate) [15]. A third of survey respondents expressed that they had met transgender women that disclosed interest in lactation induction. Nevertheless, only a mere 9% of respondents had helped transgender women to induce lactation [15]. The majority of respondents underlined the need for specialized protocols and additional training in lactation induction for transgender women [15].
Chestfeeding offers advantages when compared to infant formula feeding. For instance, chestfed infants have immunological advantages compared to formula fed infants as human milk contains anti-inflammatory agents, secretory IgA and other immunomodulators [16, 17]. Furthermore, chestfeeding offers a lower risk of infants developing certain infections, childhood obesity, asthma, necrotizing enterocolitis and sudden infant death syndrome when compared to infants that are formula-fed [16,17,18,19,20,21].
It has also been noted that chestfeeding may benefit parent–child attachment [22, 23].
Chestfeeding may provide surrogate mothers emotional benefits, regardless of the amount of milk produced [24]. One could speculate that chestfeeding, as by society it is perceived as feminine, may be gender-affirming for transgender women. Nevertheless, the chances of success and risks of the high levels of hormones in people AMAB remain unknown, and lactation induction not succeeding may be experienced as a disappointment.
Since medical literature is scarce, healthcare professionals may lack the precise knowledge about lactation induction and may therefore feel insecure when advice is requested. Subsequently, there is a rising demand for guidelines and support. Here we report a case of a transgender woman who successfully induced lactation, including a report of her experiences doing so. Furthermore, we will provide recommendations for clinical practice.
Methods
Written informed consent for this case report was obtained prior to initiation. After receiving written informed consent, medical information for the case presentation was retrieved from the electronic medical record.
For this case report we also conducted a semi-structured interview with the patient to explore the motive for lactation induction, the experience of lactation induction, and to gather additional information about the timeline and course of events. This interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim by the primary author. Information in the interview was analysed and included in the case presentation.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the institutional review board at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Ethical approval number: 2023.0229.
Case presentation
Case history
In January of 2020 a 37-year-old transgender woman (she/her), visited the centre of expertise on gender dysphoria in Amsterdam. She and her partner, a cisgender woman, wanted to fulfil their wish for a child, and both had the desire to chestfeed the infant. They had read about the possibility of lactation induction in transgender women on social media. The main motivation for lactation induction was to enhance parent–child bonding. Furthermore, they were planning to alternate chestfeeding to limit the burden, because the partner was experiencing some physical limitations.
The patient’s medical history was notable for gender incongruence. Hence, she was using gender affirming hormone therapy since October 2007 and had undergone a vaginoplasty in 2010, which was revised in 2011 and 2012. Her surgical history was also significant for an appendectomy because of appendicitis in 2010. The patient’s history was negative for smoking, alcohol and drugs.
Prior to initiating gender affirming hormone therapy she had cryopreserved her semen.
At the time of her visit to the clinic she used estradiol gel 75ug per day, once daily. Her laboratory results from her initial evaluation are displayed in Table 1.Table 1 Laboratory results over time
Course
As healthcare practitioners of the centre of expertise on gender dysphoria in Amsterdam did not have any experience with lactation induction in transgender women, her request was discussed, and medical research and literature was consulted. At that time only one previous case report, by Reisman and Goldstein, was available of lactation induction in a similar situation and the team decided to apply the same protocol [4]. Low milk production, and thus the possible inability of exclusive nursing were discussed with the patient. Hence, by shared decision making, our patient chose non-puerperal lactation induction.
Her partner conceived after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) with cryopreserved sperm of our patient. On 1st June 2020, when her partner was approximately 14 weeks gestation, our patient started non-puerperal lactation induction. The first step was the use of a 150ug estradiol adhesive dermal patch once daily and 100 mg progesterone once daily orally. Laboratory follow up after one month, on the 11th June, are shown in Table 1.
On 22nd June 2020 two pumps estradiol dermal spray (equals approximately 100ug estradiol adhesive patch) was added to the estradiol treatment regime. Our patient started manual stimulation of the nipples and breast.
On the 13th July she started domperidone 10 mg four times daily orally.
On the 20th July domperidone dosage was doubled to 20 mg four times daily orally.
On the 27th July the progesterone dosage was doubled to 100 mg twice daily orally.
She experienced gastrointestinal discomfort due to the use of domperidone, which decreased over the course of time.
Our patient and her partner visited a lactation consultant for lactation support. The lactation consultant was primarily focused on education about massaging of the breasts, pumping techniques and routines. The lactation consultant did not have prior experience with lactation induction in transgender women.
On 10th August 2020, the patient expressed the first drops of fluid from her nipples. Laboratory results are shown in Table 1. Since serum estradiol levels were high, estradiol treatment was decreased by 50ug, to a total of 200ug estradiol daily. Progesterone was increased to three times daily. Laboratory results two weeks later (27th August) are displayed in Table 1. On October 8th 2020, estradiol dosage was decreased by stopping the transdermal spray to a daily dosage of 100ug estradiol daily. On the 16th October progesterone was discontinued and the patient started pumping every four hours, including throughout the night. Every time she pumped a few droplets of milk were released. She produced approximately 2 ml milk per day. Estradiol treatment was decreased to 50ug daily.
On the 5th November 2020 her partner gave birth to their child at 38 weeks and 2 days gestation. Her partner was induced because of gestational diabetes. Both mothers continued or commenced pumping. Our patient produced a maximum of 7 mls a day, which was enough for supplementary feeding. Since the infant had a short lingual frenulum, latching to the nipple was suboptimal and caused suckling problems. She decided to discontinue lactation induction two weeks after the birth of her child, because she experienced the frequent pumping to be exhausting and milk production to be low. Two weeks after the birth her estradiol dosage was increased to 100ug.
Our patient reported that lactation induction did not have a significant effect on her gender identity, neither did it alter the amount of gender dysphoria experienced. The short duration of lactation and low milk production were not experienced negatively, but she experienced the decision to stop as “tough”. She was happy to have achieved lactation and for her infant to latch on and be comforted a few times. Though she knew that (exclusive) nursing was probably not possible, she expressed that “it was a pity” that the experience of long-term feeding had not been possible. Figure 1 shows a summary of highlights in the treatment regime of the patient.
Discussion
Case discussion
This case endorses that lactation induction protocols are also successful in transgender women. Our study is in line with published case reports, in which lactation induction was successful, but the production of milk was not sufficient for exclusive nursing [4, 5, 11]. Nevertheless, as the success of induced lactation is often attributed to parent-infant bonding, rather than the possibility of exclusive chestfeeding, this experience is valuable [25,26,27].
The success of non-puerperal lactation induction and the amount of milk produced depends on several factors [28, 29]. Physical stimulation of the breast tissue is an important factor in promoting lactation in non-puerperal breasts. In our case, due to a short lingual frenulum, the infant latched suboptimally, causing suckling problems. This caused our patient to discontinue lactation after two weeks. These suckling problems may have contributed to low milk production and a shorter period of lactation compared to cases described by prior reports [4, 5, 11]. Another contributory factor may be the time our patient used a breast pump to stimulate the breasts in comparison to other studies. Though our patient started manual stimulation and expression almost 20 weeks prior to delivery of her child, she only started using a breast pump three weeks before delivery, because labour was induced at approximately 38 weeks of gestation due to gestational diabetes. The period our patient was able to use a breast pump prior to the birth of her child was short compared to at least six weeks described in other reports and may have contributed to the low milk production [4, 5, 11]. Our participant refrained from visiting the lactation consultant provided by the hospital, but chose to be guided by a lactation consultant outside of our hospital, hence we did not discuss pumping advice.
Prenatal development of mammary tissue is similar in both males and females. In cisgender women breast development starts at puberty under influence of estrogen. Breast tissue composition changes during pregnancy and lactation [30]. In transgender women breast development occurs after initiation of gender affirming hormone therapy; typically combining estrogen with an anti-androgen. The breast of transgender women are indistinguishable from those of cisgender women on radiography [30, 31]. Nevertheless it is suggested that compared to cisgender women, transgender women have smaller breast and may not reach full breast maturity [30]. Successful lactation is independent of breast volume [32]. However, studies suggest that women with mammary hypoplasia and inadequate glandular tissue may be at risk for lactation failure [33,34,35,36,37,38].
In our case and the case presented by Wamboldt 2021, the breast size and maturation has not been described [5]. The cases presented by Reisman 2018 and Weimer 2023 do respectively describe degree of maturation and size [4, 11]. In Weimer’s report the patient also underwent mammogram with ultrasound for a medical reason, which was notable for extremely dense breast tissue [11]. Nevertheless, the breast tissue of lactating transgender women has not been analyzed yet and have not been uniformly described in previous published cases. Therefore, the effect of breast maturation on the success of induced lactation for transgender women is not known.
In our case report we did not analyze the nutritional value of milk produced by our patient. Only one previous report has assessed the milk produced by their patient. Weimer et al. assessed their participant’s milk and found values of fat, lactose, protein and calorie were comparable and even higher than those in term milk produced by cisgender women. They did not assess micronutrients and bioactive factors [11]….
CRITIQUES
